Hello, Quinn Raymond, thanks for joining the discussion. It's probably not something that could be added to the bill at this point. However, cwlumm (commenter who posted a few posts up in this thread has some interesting thoughts and workaround on this exact issue. You may be interested in that.
Hi, again, Quinn Raymond. They would apply to services like Uber and Lyft because those type of e-hail car services fall within the for-hire-vehicle category (FHV). You see the treatment of FHV's in the summary of the bill in the pane just to the right.
Wait, I get that that's a City issue... nevermind.
View this comment in the discussion thread
Hello, Quinn Raymond, thanks for joining the discussion. It's probably not something that could be added to the bill at this point. However, cwlumm (commenter who posted a few posts up in this thread has some interesting thoughts and workaround on this exact issue. You may be interested in that.
View this comment in the discussion thread
Hi, again, Quinn Raymond. They would apply to services like Uber and Lyft because those type of e-hail car services fall within the for-hire-vehicle category (FHV). You see the treatment of FHV's in the summary of the bill in the pane just to the right.
View this comment in the discussion thread