➤ What the bill does: Directs MNYHTA to distribute money from the MNYM Fund, each year, in the following priority:
- To TBTA, the amount necessary to make up for reduction in tolls on the 7 MTA bridges. Make-up payments are to be calculated and paid quarterly.
- To NYC-DOT, the amortized cost of toll collection equipment, as well as maintenance and toll administration costs
- To NYC-DOT, up to $300 million for actual and verifiable costs of maintaining the East River Bridges
- To MTA, $487 million, which MTA can use to borrow up to $7.3 billion to fund the 2015-19 Capital Plan
- To NYC-DOT, $75 million plus any money in category 3 not needed for the East River Bridges, to be used for miscellaneous road and bridge maintenance and improvements
- To MTA, $121 million to fund improved transit access throughout the 5 NYC boroughs (Subtopic 4)
- To MTA $300 million, which is to be bonded to create a new $4.566 billion "transit gap investment fund" focused on the 5 boroughs (Subtopic 2 )
- To MTA, $47 million, which is to be bonded to create a $700 million "suburban transit capital projects fund" focused on Nassau, Suffolk, Rockland, Orange, Westchester, Putnam and Duchess counties (Subtopic 3)
- Any remaining money is to be distributed 75% to MTA and 25% to NYC-DOT, to be used for capital projects only.
Read the legislative language: P.A.L. § 97-pppp(5).
➤ Rationale: The first priority for MNYM Fund disbursements is replacing revenue lost from reducing tolls on the 7 MTA bridges, because the original tolls were part of the revenue stream against which MTA has borrowed money. Next, the costs of installing and operating the new tolling equipment are to be covered.
Then, a total of $375 million will be directed to roads and bridges maintained by NYC-DOT (categories 3 and 5). The East River Bridges get priority, based on NYC-DOT's estimates of necessary maintenance over a 10-year time horizon. Beyond that, money is made available to address the large percentage of City roadways in poor to fair condition (PDF pp. 8, 12-17).
Next, MTA receives an amount sufficient to bond up to $7.3 billion for additional funding of its 5-year capital plan. Then, $121 million is allocated to fund various measures that can be taken quickly to make public transit more affordable and available for commuters who now have limited transit alternatives. (For specifics, see Subtopic 4). The next priorities are revenue sufficient to establish two new bonded funds: one will address transit gaps and fund locally-supported transportation projects in each of the five NYC boroughs (For specifics, see Subtopic 2), while the other will support suburban transit improvements. (For specifics, see Subtopic 3).
All money in the MNYM Fund is to be paid out each year, with MTA (75%) and NYC-DOT (25%) splitting anything left after the listed payments. Total revenue from the new tolls and surcharges (net of TBTA toll revenue replacement and toll collection costs) is estimated to be $1.35 billion a year.


Comments6
Commenting is now closed.
TOM MURPHY
March 24, 2016 - 12:29pm
NYSDOT has informed the Sunset Park Brooklyn Community Board #7 that they have no funding to replace missing cladding and paint the entire of the Gowanus Expressway(NYS's longest bridge) when they complete structural steel support repairs. When this part of the re-build is done; they are done. They walk away, and leave a rusting hulk from Bay Ridge to the Hicks Street cut. This is intolerable and I think you ought to know.
Moderator
March 24, 2016 - 6:04pm
Tom Murphy, the MoveNY legislation would assign funds to several different agencies but not to the State DOT, which has authority over that bridge. You may contact them with feedback here. You can contact your state assembly member directly as well, who can better speak to matters outside this bill.
R.J.HitsC
April 27, 2016 - 6:35pm
To me this reads like good old fashioned give everyone their piece politicing. If there has to be a bill, then substitute standards or criteria for a schedule of who gets what money. For a minute you had me, but then I read the list of moneygetters. Kill that part, and I'm in. Don't, and I hope disappear.
To be clear, criteria for who gets money instead of a list of who gets money. That's what I think will make this something decent.
Les14
May 1, 2016 - 3:01pm
I sort of agree with this. I wonder could anything get done in new york state politics without this kind of list of "moneygetters." So long as the good outweighs the bad, it might be ok. Although, I don't know if the good outweighs the bad. I do generally agree though that if it can be done with criteria for getting money instead of an upfront list of who gets money, that would be preferable.
Moderator
May 2, 2016 - 3:59pm
Hello, R.J.HitsC, thank you for joining the discussion. It's an interesting idea to have criteria replace a list of political beneficiaries. Since you've given us a suggestion on this issue, I'd like to follow up with another related question:
Setting aside, for the moment, the "moneygetters" issue, do you support the other parts of the bill generally and do you agree with the rationale for investments, as stated in the window to the left, in this topic (3.1)?
envcat
May 4, 2016 - 4:20pm
I'd like to see something other than the G line provide Brooklyn-Queens mass transit during rush hour. Something express during rush hour. As a native NYer, I can say that Manhattan is NOT the center of the city.